docs: add AI assistance notice (#1917)

* docs: add AI assistance notice

* docs: add TODO item for AI disclosure

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
 
 #### To-Dos
 
+- [ ] Disclosed any use of AI (see our [policy](https://github.com/fallenbagel/jellyseerr/blob/docs-contributing/CONTRIBUTING.md#ai-assistance-notice))
 - [ ] Successful build `pnpm build`
 - [ ] Translation keys `pnpm i18n:extract`
 - [ ] Database migration (if required)

CONTRIBUTING.md

@@ -2,6 +2,45 @@
 
 All help is welcome and greatly appreciated! If you would like to contribute to the project, the following instructions should get you started...
 
+## AI Assistance Notice
+
+> [!IMPORTANT]
+>
+> If you are using **any kind of AI assistance** to contribute to Jellyseerr,
+> it must be disclosed in the pull request.
+
+If you are using any kind of AI assistance while contributing to Jellyseerr,
+**this must be disclosed in the pull request**, along with the extent to
+which AI assistance was used (e.g. docs only vs. code generation).
+If PR responses are being generated by an AI, disclose that as well.
+As a small exception, trivial tab-completion doesn't need to be disclosed,
+so long as it is limited to single keywords or short phrases.
+
+An example disclosure:
+
+> This PR was written primarily by Claude Code.
+
+Or a more detailed disclosure:
+
+> I consulted ChatGPT to understand the codebase but the solution
+> was fully authored manually by myself.
+
+Failure to disclose this is first and foremost rude to the human operators
+on the other end of the pull request, but it also makes it difficult to
+determine how much scrutiny to apply to the contribution.
+
+In a perfect world, AI assistance would produce equal or higher quality
+work than any human. That isn't the world we live in today, and in most cases
+it's generating slop. I say this despite being a fan of and using them
+successfully myself (with heavy supervision)!
+
+When using AI assistance, we expect contributors to understand the code
+that is produced and be able to answer critical questions about it. It
+isn't a maintainers job to review a PR so broken that it requires
+significant rework to be acceptable.
+
+Please be respectful to maintainers and disclose AI assistance.
+
 ## Development
 
 ### Tools Required
@@ -158,4 +197,4 @@ DB_TYPE="postgres" DB_USER=postgres DB_PASS=postgres pnpm migration:generate ser
 
 ## Attribution
 
-This contribution guide was inspired by the [Next.js](https://github.com/vercel/next.js), [Radarr](https://github.com/Radarr/Radarr), and [Overseerr](https://github.com/sct/Overseerr) contribution guides.
+This contribution guide was inspired by the [Next.js](https://github.com/vercel/next.js), [Radarr](https://github.com/Radarr/Radarr), [Overseerr](https://github.com/sct/Overseerr) and [Ghostty](https://github.com/ghostty-org/ghostty) contribution guides.